U.S. Steel spurns $7.25 billion takeover offer from Cleveland-Cliffs
Cliffs said it submitted the proposal privately on July 28 and received a rejection letter on Sunday, calling the offer “unreasonable.” U.S. Steel later confirmed the response, but defended its decision saying that Cliffs had refused to sign a non-disclosure agreement unless the Pittsburgh-based producer agreed to the economic terms of the proposal in advance.
The back-and-forth jousting was part of a whirlwind Sunday in which two of the biggest American steelmakers thrust the future makeup of the industry into question, just a week from the start of the biggest steel conference in North America.
Potential impact on auto industry
The combined company would hold a powerful position as the primary supplier to the U.S. auto industry,
In 2022, U.S. Steel shipments to the automotive and transportation segments increased almost 10 percent to 3.25 million tons, its largest single business segment, the company said in an annual regulatory filing.
Cleveland-Cliffs said automotive customers made up 31 percent of its revenue in 2022, up from 25 percent in 2021.
A deal with U.S. Steel would catapult Cliffs into the ranks of the top producers globally, a list dominated by China.
A combined company also would own 100 percent of domestic iron ore reserves. It’s an issue U.S. Steel addressed in its letter to Cliffs, saying it had discussed with Cliffs’ counsel questions that both sides would need to better understand to assess antitrust risk in the proposal.
Cliffs, which was traditionally an iron ore miner rather than a steelmaker, has been the most active dealmaker in the U.S. industry in recent years — first snapping up AK Steel Holding Corp., and then buying the U.S. business of European steel giant ArcelorMittal. The purchases made Cliffs a key operator of traditional blast furnaces in the U.S., and gave it a massive foothold in the highly profitable business of steelmaking for the car industry.
Demand outlook
The bid comes at a time when producers such as U.S. Steel are predicting that domestic demand will benefit from green-energy infrastructure and manufacturing projects, bolstered by the Biden administration’s Inflation Reduction Act.
It also shines a light on one of the key dynamics in the global steel industry: the divide between traditional blast-furnace production of steel from iron ore, and the more efficient, cost-effective and lower-emission plants that remelt scrap and turn it into steel, called electric-arc furnaces.
Cliffs CEO Lourenco Goncalves, known for his combative personality and who never shies away from publicly stating his opinions, still has little footprint in electric-arc furnaces.
However, U.S. Steel, which traces its roots back to 1901 when J. Pierpont Morgan merged a collection of assets with Andrew Carnegie’s Carnegie Steel Co., has undergone a dramatic shift in recent years under CEO David Burritt, as its investment focus pivoted toward the more modern plants.
Burritt, who took the helm of the then-struggling metal producer in 2017, purchased Big River Steel in Arkansas and expects to pour an additional $3 billion in the operation by 2024 to double its capacity. The bet has paid off, with shares of the company doubling since the end of 2019, although the stock had retreated 9.3 percent this year through last week. Cliffs had declined 8.8 percent in 2023.
Ohio-based Cliffs said on Sunday it offered to pay $17.50 in cash and 1.023 of its shares for each U.S. Steel stock. That implies a value of $32.53 per share as of Friday’s close, a 43 percent premium to U.S. Steel’s last closing price of $22.72 and values the Pittsburgh-based company at about $7.25 billion.
“Although we are now public, I do look forward to continuing to engage with U.S. Steel on a potential transaction, as I am convinced that the value potential and competitiveness to come out of a combination of our two iconic American companies is exceptional,” Goncalves said in the statement.
U.S. Steel has hired Barclays Capital Inc. and Goldman Sachs Group Inc. as financial advisers for its strategic review. The steelmaker hasn’t set a deadline for the review to be completed, and the process may not result in a transaction or any other strategic outcome, the company said in its statement.
Cliffs is being advised by Moelis & Company LLC, Wells Fargo, JPMorgan and UBS, and Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP is serving as its legal counsel.
Automotive News contributed to this report.
